Difference between revisions of "User talk:KE9H"

From HPSDRwiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Off line edit?: new section)
(indent replies)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
  
 
I noticed that [[ALEXIARES]] contained an HTML comment at the top <nowiki>(<!-- ALEX Edit version 6-3-4    April 26, 2008 -->)</nowiki> and I thought you might be editing it offline.  If so, please consider my changes before uploading a new version... Thanks, [[User:VK2NRA|Richard Ames, VK2NRA]] 22:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 
I noticed that [[ALEXIARES]] contained an HTML comment at the top <nowiki>(<!-- ALEX Edit version 6-3-4    April 26, 2008 -->)</nowiki> and I thought you might be editing it offline.  If so, please consider my changes before uploading a new version... Thanks, [[User:VK2NRA|Richard Ames, VK2NRA]] 22:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:I sometimes edit off line, but only for major changes.  I like your "tune-up" of the formatting, so there is no reason to change it or reverse it. Thanks, [[User:KE9H|Graham]] 13:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Recent Cyclops edit ==
 +
 +
I changed the date to reflect your recent edit to the [[CYCLOPS|Cyclops]] page but I don't understand your "Original Schematics were posted, now superseded by the above information package". I don't see any "information package" above???? Regards, [[User:VK2NRA|Richard Ames, VK2NRA]] 21:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
.... Possibly you mean just the information that is above....  I'll remove the word package. Regards, [[User:VK2NRA|Richard Ames, VK2NRA]] 21:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Standby. Information being uploaded.  Check back in an hour --- Graham
 +
 +
::Testing, [[User:KE9H|Graham]] 00:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Intro in Cyclops ==
 +
 +
I moved the image to the top and deleted the section head "Introduction".  My reasoning is along the lines in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lead_section http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lead_section]
 +
 +
Basically the first section in each article (page) should be the introduction to the article/page and therefore should not need a heading.  I hope this is OK with you.... if not change it back and I will respect your desires....  Regards, [[User:VK2NRA|Richard Ames, VK2NRA]] 01:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:That is fine.  You have a better sense for editing the Wiki than I do.  It looks fine. [[User:KE9H|Graham]] 02:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:43, 11 July 2009

PHY

Thanks for the definition! I had sort of guessed it must mean physical. Richard Ames, VK2NRA 18:58, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Off line edit?

I noticed that ALEXIARES contained an HTML comment at the top (<!-- ALEX Edit version 6-3-4 April 26, 2008 -->) and I thought you might be editing it offline. If so, please consider my changes before uploading a new version... Thanks, Richard Ames, VK2NRA 22:31, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

I sometimes edit off line, but only for major changes. I like your "tune-up" of the formatting, so there is no reason to change it or reverse it. Thanks, Graham 13:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Recent Cyclops edit

I changed the date to reflect your recent edit to the Cyclops page but I don't understand your "Original Schematics were posted, now superseded by the above information package". I don't see any "information package" above???? Regards, Richard Ames, VK2NRA 21:01, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

.... Possibly you mean just the information that is above.... I'll remove the word package. Regards, Richard Ames, VK2NRA 21:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Standby. Information being uploaded. Check back in an hour --- Graham
Testing, Graham 00:00, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Intro in Cyclops

I moved the image to the top and deleted the section head "Introduction". My reasoning is along the lines in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lead_section

Basically the first section in each article (page) should be the introduction to the article/page and therefore should not need a heading. I hope this is OK with you.... if not change it back and I will respect your desires.... Regards, Richard Ames, VK2NRA 01:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

That is fine. You have a better sense for editing the Wiki than I do. It looks fine. Graham 02:37, 12 July 2009 (UTC)