[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xylo-SDR] Saxo

To: <xylo-sdr@lists.ae5k.us>
Subject: [Xylo-SDR] Saxo
From: "Christopher T. Day" <CTDay@lbl.gov>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:29:37 -0800
List-archive: </pipermail/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us>
List-help: <mailto:xylo-sdr-request@lists.ae5k.us?subject=help>
List-id: Xylo-SDR Discussion <xylo-sdr-ae5k.us>
List-post: <mailto:xylo-sdr@lists.ae5k.us>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.ae5k.us/listinfo.cgi/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us>, <mailto:xylo-sdr-request@lists.ae5k.us?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.ae5k.us/listinfo.cgi/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us>, <mailto:xylo-sdr-request@lists.ae5k.us?subject=unsubscribe>
Reply-to: Xylo-SDR Discussion <xylo-sdr@lists.ae5k.us>
Thread-index: AcYe+6/9/E1wFK12SASa7uZMs0Vyaw==
Thread-topic: [Xylo-SDR] Saxo

What few useful thoughs I've had so far on the subject agree with yours - if possible [does the USB Audio Device spec go as far as 24-bit stereo, 96/192 ksamples/sec?], the USB-2 interface should be able to use a generic USB Audio Device driver => we don't have to supply/maintain one for any/all OS. But then, I know almost nothing yet,

Chris - AE6VK

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xylo-SDR] Saxo
  - From: "Phil Harman" <pvharman@arach.net.au>

Prev by Date: Re: [Xylo-SDR] Teamspeak FPGA discussion - Have we paintedourselves into a corner? Boxed ourselves in?
Next by Date: Re: [Xylo-SDR] Architecture review
Previous by thread: Re: [Xylo-SDR] Teamspeak FPGA discussion - Have we paintedourselves into a corner? Boxed ourselves in?
Next by thread: Re: [Xylo-SDR] Saxo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread