[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xylo-SDR] RFC - RF Routing and Connections
I have never used those, but I can attest to the difficulty sometimes
of getting a cable on or off a SNA. I have fat fingers.
Before Leon commits to producing a prototype, are we need two more
coming in to bring in the 200MHz (LVDS) clock? They should be to a
pair of pins that feed a LDVS pin pair, should it not have a receiver chip?
At 01:21 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote:
Rather than SMA I'd suggest that we use SMB. They are smaller and the fact
that they snap on makes them much easier to attach/remove on a close spaced
Plenty surplus from:
I've been using them for years without any reliability issues.
Quoting Leon Heller <email@example.com>:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Eric Ellison
> To: 'Xylo-SDR Discussion'
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 2:01 PM
> Subject: [Xylo-SDR] RFC - RF Routing and Connections
> Cecil brought up an important subject in routing RF.
> I suggest that for any RF coming offboard designers use PCB mount right
> angle SMA connectors.
Xylo-SDR mailing list
To post msg: Xylo-SDR@ae5k.us
Subscription help: http://lists.ae5k.us/listinfo.cgi/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us
Xylo-SDR web page: http://xylo-sdr.ae5k.us
Forum pages: http://www.hamsdr.com/hamsdrforum/
"I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't;
only a few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ... "