Ray
I?m showing my ignorance, but I was under the impression that LVDS used twisted pair and was not a ?buss friendly? design.
Multi-drop would seem logical, since folks already have other designs in mind for buss mounted cards.
Thanks
Eric
From: xylo-sdr-bounces@lists.ae5k.us [ mailto:xylo-sdr-bounces@lists.ae5k.us] On Behalf Of Ray Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 5:26 PM
To: xylo-sdr@lists.ae5k.us
Cc: Ray Anderson
Subject: [Xylo-SDR] LVDS buss topologies
At the following URLs there are Visio and JPEG drawings of 3 common LVDS buss topologies (Point to Point, Multi-Drop, and Multi-point) that might be found on a backplane. Each comes with it?s own challenges and problems.
http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=144 (Visio format)
http://www.hamsdr.com/dnld.aspx?id=145 (.jpg format)
In the case of the Point to Point topology there is a single driver on the buss and multiple receivers. In the Multi-Point topologies there can be multiple drivers as well as multiple receivers. If I am interpreting the Janus and Lionheart block diagrams correctly it seems that the currently envisioned topology is point-to-point (Janus and Lionheart only). With the desire for extra backplane slots it looks like Multi-Drop. Are there applications envisioned in the future that might place multiple drivers on the buss in the Multi-point topology?
-Ray WB6TPU
_______________________________________________
Xylo-SDR mailing list
To post msg: Xylo-SDR@ae5k.us
Subscription help: http://lists.ae5k.us/listinfo.cgi/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us
Xylo-SDR web page: http://xylo-sdr.ae5k.us
Forum pages: http://www.hamsdr.com/hamsdrforum/
Archives: http://lists.ae5k.us/pipermail/xylo-sdr-ae5k.us/
Cecil Bayona
KD5NWA
www.qrpradio.com
I fail to see why doing the same thing over and over and getting the
same results every time is insanity: I've almost proved it isn't; only a
few more tests now and I'm sure results will differ this time ...